Section-level content diagnostics

Find where your content loses focus.

Give it one target query and your draft. Every section comes back Strong, Mixed, Drift or Unknown — with the wording behind each verdict and the section worth fixing first. No single score to chase, and no language model reads your writing.

2 free analyses. No card required.

Topic Drift report

semantic content editor

74 / 100

Summary

Mostly aligned, with one section pulling the article away from search intent.

Intent match81
Topic alignment72
Coverage68

Topic Drift Map

4 sections

Introduction

Strong

82

Feature overview

Mixed

64

Industry history

Drift

31

How to choose

Strong

76

Why it is small

Built for one job.

Content optimizers keep growing — writers, audits, rank tracking, AI visibility. If you need all of it, buy all of it. This is for the check you actually run before publishing.

No model reads your draft

Analysis runs on our own server with deterministic text processing. Nothing is sent to a third-party AI provider.

Same input, same report

There is no sampling step, so a draft and a query always produce the identical verdict. You can re-check an edit and trust the difference.

No queue, no waiting

A pasted draft is analysed in-process, so the report is there immediately. Importing from a URL adds a few seconds.

Workflow

One draft. Three clear decisions.

The whole check fits between finishing a draft and publishing it. Each step hands you evidence and leaves the editorial call where it belongs.

01

Set the target

One query, one draft. Paste the text or hand over a published URL — there is no project to set up, no keyword list to import, and a URL that refuses to import costs you nothing.

You decide

Which single query this page is really trying to answer.

02

See the drift

The draft comes back as a map of its own sections, each marked Strong, Mixed, Drift or Unknown — alongside the wording that earned the mark and the subject the section leans on instead.

You decide

Which flags are real drift, and which ones you meant to write.

03

Fix what matters

The weakest sections are ranked and each arrives with a direction to take — reframe it, move it, tighten it, cut it — instead of a list of terms to sprinkle back into your sentences.

You decide

What actually changes before this goes out, and what stays.

Read the full method and its limits — how sections are split, how verdicts are decided, and what the report cannot tell you yet.

What drifting looks like

Six ways an article loses the plot.

A report marks the section and shows the text behind the verdict. Naming the pattern is the part you do — these are the six worth knowing.

Topic drift

The section is about a neighbouring subject, not yours.

A page targeting AI headshot generators spends three paragraphs on general photo editing.

Intent drift

Right subject, wrong job.

The reader came to use a tool; the section explains what the category is instead.

Scope drift

The lens is too wide or too narrow.

A piece about LinkedIn headshots turns into a general portrait photography guide.

Missing concepts

Something the subject needs never appears.

A headshot page never mentions business profiles or corporate portraits at all.

Competing emphasis

A side feature crowds out the main one.

Filters and background removal get more room than the generation flow itself.

Heading–body mismatch

The heading promises one thing, the text delivers another.

An H2 reads “How it works” and the paragraphs underneath only discuss pricing tiers.

The report

Evidence before recommendations.

Every signal remains explainable. If the data is not available, the report says Unknown instead of inventing certainty.

Topic Drift Map

Scan Strong, Mixed, Drift, and Unknown sections at a glance.

Intent diagnosis

Compare the likely query job with the emphasis of your draft.

Priority fixes

Start with the weakest section and a concrete editing direction.

Honest uncertainty

Unavailable SERP evidence stays visibly Unknown.

Against score chasing

There is no number to get to 100.

Give a writer one score and a suggestion list, and the work becomes clearing the list. Terms get wedged into sentences that did not want them, the bar turns green, and the draft reads worse than when it started.

So this report refuses the single number. Each section gets a verdict and the text that produced it. You read the evidence and make the editorial call — which is the part a tool should not be taking from you.

A priority fix, in full

Industry history drifts away from the target query

Evidence
“The first commercial darkroom processes appeared in the 1880s, and for most of the next century…”
Why it is flagged
None of the query’s concepts appear in 240 words, and the section’s dominant terms belong to a neighbouring topic.
Direction
Cut to two sentences, or move it below the sections that answer the query directly.

Pricing

No monthly floor.

A renewal can get more expensive even when the screen you use has not changed. Here, $9 buys 10 analyses that never expire. Subscriptions exist if the volume suits you.

Compare all plans

Free

2 reports

Validate the workflow with real content.

Credit pack

No subscription

$9 once

10 analyses, yours until you use them.

Creator

Most popular

$19 / month

40 analyses every month.

Credits never expireFailed analyses are refunded

FAQ

Questions worth asking first.

Including the ones where the answer is no.